"I don't think the voters should have any lack of confidence," she said. Mail-in ballots 'smudge' snafu needs erasers As much as 80 percent of county ballots are mail-in, according to county officialsĭespite the glitch, Kniss said she is confident that the count is correct. The registrar's office could not be reached Tuesday morning about whether there would be any delays in the vote count. A company representative mailed a copy of the ballot to himself to check the mailing and accepted the ballot as being correct, she said. Kniss said no one at the registrar's office sees the ballot before it is mailed out. The ballots are mailed out by ProVote, Lierman said. ProVote would reimburse the county for costs to inspect and clean the ballots, he said. Santa Clara County is the only county that appears to be affected by the smudged ballots, according to Lierman. The company provides ballots for 15 California counties, Vice President Brian Lierman said. ProVote has been certified by the state of California for the last six years as an election printer for a number of ballot types. NASPO is a nonprofit organization that certifies providers of documents who follow specific security protocols. ProVote is the only North American Security Product Organization (NASPO)-certified election printer in the United States, according to the company website. Elaine Larson, assistant registrar, notified the county executive's office of the problem, Kniss said. Registrar of Voters Jesse Durazo was in Mexico attending a funeral and could not be reached when the problem was discovered last week. But county supervisors did not learn of the major mail-in-ballot snafu until Monday, Nov. 27 when the machines were rejecting a larger number of ballots than usual, Kniss said. The County Registrar's office discovered the problem last Wednesday, Oct. But by late Tuesday afternoon county officials were predicting some delays due to the problem and the length of the ballot. It is undetermined whether the snafu will delay the announcement of election results tonight. Vote-counting optical scanners initially rejected more than 100,000 Santa Clara County mail-in ballots, Supervisor Liz Kniss said today. The glitch could affect up to 80 percent of the county vote, officials said this morning. The ICO will however continue to monitor the situation and cooperate with other supervisory authorities where required.Hundreds of thousands of Santa Clara County mail-in ballots must have an ink smudge hand erased before they can be counted, in a major mail-in ballot snafu. It is always the company’s responsibility to identify when UK citizens have been affected as part of a data breach and take steps to reduce any harm to consumers. “Under the GDPR,” said the data protection regulator, “organisations must assess if a breach should be reported to the ICO, or to the equivalent supervisory body if they are not based in the UK. The ICO eventually got round to telling us that it’s shrugging its shoulders. ® Update 1630 GMTĪfter we repeatedly poked Amazon’s UK press office with a pointy stick, they eventually agreed to say that this is not a breach in the sense of a hack while maintaining that the snafu is an inadvertent technical error and that they emailed customers from an abundance of caution. Others tweeting about it include folk in the Netherlands and what appears to be South Korea. Drew Alden - Looking for Work! November 21, 2018Īlden gives his location in his Twitter profile as Phoenix, Arizona, which is in the US. When are companies like going to realize how to write a proper breach letter? Once again this sounds scammy as shit and has a completely unnecessary link at the bottom. Meanwhile, out in the badlands of Twitter, people from across the world were wondering whether they'd been spammed or whether the email was genuine:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |